In the aftermath of the war in Gaza, controversy over Gaza's ownership has become increasingly apparent, mainly involving differences between Israel and the United States. Israel has paid enormous efforts and costs in this battle, and they are unwilling to withdraw Gaza immediately and are interested in including it within the limits of Israeli territory. The United States, however, insists that Gaza remains Palestinian territory and cannot be occupied by Israel. This disagreement not only reflects the difference between the two sides' positions on the issue of resolving the conflict, but also reveals the dilemma of the United States in balancing interests in the Middle East and maintaining alliances.
The United States has proposed three solutions to the question of Gaza's ownership. The first is a multinational force formed by the United States, Britain and France, which will be responsible for Gaza's security, and temporarily transfer management to a committee composed of neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The second option is the formation of a multinational force to assume security and management responsibilities in Gaza. The third option is to place Gaza in the custody of the United Nations. The introduction of these programs shows the efforts of the United States in seeking to balance the interests of Israel and Arab countries. However, Israel does not endorse these plans, insisting that Gaza is Israel's business and does not require US intervention.
Israel's position is very clear: they have eliminated the Hamas organization in Gaza through this battle and are unwilling to hand over Gaza to Palestinian administration. Israel believes that if they do not take actual control of Gaza and hand it over to the Palestinians, then there is a risk that Hamas will make a comeback and pose a threat to Israel's security that can never be eliminated. In addition, Israel has always had ambitions to expand its territory, especially in the face of existential crises and strategic space considerations. They have won in all wars in the Middle East, including the occupation of the Golan Heights in Syria. For Israel, Gaza is a strategically important area, and control of Gaza is very important to ensure Israel's security and interests.
The United States and Israel are allies, but there are clear differences between the two sides over the question of Gaza's ownership. Israel insists on its own interests and is unwilling to accept the instructions and intervention of the United States, which needs to balance and balance between Israel and Arab countries. The United States must not only support Israel, but also take into account the interests and demands of neighboring Arab countries. If the United States completely turns to Israel, then the Arab countries may leave the United States, and the influence of the United States in the Middle East will be greatly reduced. Therefore, the United States needs to strike a balance between the two.
For Biden, how to solve this dilemma is a serious test. They can neither offend Israel, an important ally, nor lose the support of Arab countries. Faced with this dilemma, the United States can only adopt a compromise solution, which is to support Israel's efforts to eliminate Hamas and to make Gaza a Palestinian territory. This is undoubtedly a stopgap measure, but there is still uncertainty about whether it will meet the needs of all parties.
The question of Gaza's post-war ownership is both a consequence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and a difficult question in international relations. On this issue, Israel and the United States have displayed their different interests and positions, deepened the differences between the two countries, and highlighted the contradictions between them. Israel's control of Gaza has its historical and strategic considerations, and the United States needs to balance its alliance with balancing regional interests. For their part, the Palestinian people, regardless of to whom Gaza belongs, want to be able to live in peace, security and stability.
Personally, resolving the issue of Gaza's ownership requires balancing the interests and concerns of all parties. Israel and Palestine should resolve the issue of belonging through dialogue and negotiation and make efforts for peace and stability in the region. The international community should also take an active part in this process and provide support and assistance for the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It is only through joint efforts that reconciliation and development in Gaza can be achieved and a better future for the inhabitants of the region.