The final review is approaching, as a teacher, I have worked hard for a semester, and I always want students to know everything they should know, which may be a kind of expectation for all teachers to students.
Things often backfire. There are always more or less students in a class, who are not so fond of learning, who always seem to understand what they have learned, and almost half of a test paper is wrong. In the face of this kind of student, what good can we teachers do?Everything that should be talked about has been taught, and even some topics have been talked about many times, but students just don't do it right, and when they do it, they make mistakes. Some students don't even know the old knowledge, but it's not that the new knowledge can't be known. When asked about him, he seems to be able to do it and doesn't seem to be able to, in this case, he will do it all wrong. He didn't really understand the connections and differences between knowledge, he just scratched the surface. 
When reviewing, if you do a one-size-fits-all approach, there will always be students who can't keep up, but if you take care of the students who are poor, it will affect the review effect of the top students, which poses a difficult problem to the teacher. If we think about it carefully, in fact, the purpose of review is really to catch the difference, and we hope that students with a poor learning foundation can deepen their understanding of knowledge and improve the effect of learning in the second review. For students who excel in their studies and middle and upper middle school students, they have a very strong ability to learn independently, and they almost do not need the company of teachers, and they can review independently according to their own needs. If the whole class keeps up with the poor students, it will undoubtedly suppress the development of the top students.
Teachers should not expect too much from students with poor learning foundations, which will increase students' learning pressure on the one hand, and make both teachers and students lose on the other. Therefore, when we review, we should be different from person to person, teach from person to person, and different people use different methods. For these students, the requirements should be lowered, focusing on basic knowledge, basic computing ability, calculation methods, formula citation, etc., for difficult, expanding the ability of knowledge can not be required for these students to master, as an interest to understand. The cultivation of computing ability should be the focus of review, and the various types of calculations learned in this semester should be classified for solid training and review, so that students with learning difficulties can firmly grasp the calculation methods and be able to calculate accurately. Conducting special reviews is conducive to students' classification of exercises and improvement of ability. For the basic knowledge in each special review, these students are required to master as much as possible.
When reviewing, teachers must treat students with a peaceful mind, do not get angry because students have not mastered the knowledge points, must control their emotions, and remember that impulsiveness is the devil. Always treat the student with a tolerant heart, today he did not learn, maybe in the future with the passage of time, he will be, but the time has not yet come. Believe that every flower has a flowering period, but some flowers bloom early and some flowers bloom late. We just need to water and fertilize the flowers now, and one day it will bloom. Teachers need to pay attention to every student with their love and patience, so that every child can feel that he is seen, valued, and respected, and maybe one day he will be influenced by you and become an honor student, and then miracles will happen.