"As soon as A shares enter the deep sea, Hu Lang is angry from then on."
The Hu Lang I'm talking about is Hu Xijin.
Hu Xijin has been a little angry recently. On November 24, he posted a blog saying that "the fake company Xilong Science, after the East Window incident, was openly hyped by the institution and created 8 daily limits." Yunyun, and then deleted his post, the reason is unknown.
* After the novice period, I lost money, my face was ugly, and my words were ugly, all like this, I can understand.
He once said"Can't let ** continue to fall, when the economy is very strong, that kind of problem may not be big;But at a time when the economy is relatively sluggish, it can mean more risk and uncertainty"。
He said this as if he didn't say it.
It's not good when the economy is booming, and can you expect it to get better when the economy is down?
If the economic downturn can still rise, then it is not only a "barometer of the economy", but also a "reverse barometer of the economy". Research on this topic deserves a Nobel Prize in economics.
Hu Xijin so-called""Let the ** fall" is not in line with the truth, the measures that should be introduced have been introduced, especially the reduction of interest rates and stamp duty, which is a major positive.
It's just that the market hasn't caught these positives.
The biggest benefit is that the listed companies themselves are operating well. If the listed company has enough cash dividends, I dare not say how high it will rise, at least it will not fall all the way.
Our ** does not rise much when the economic situation is good (the most violent economic growth in 2007 is only 6124 points), and when the economy is in a downturn, it is very cooperative**, why are there so many small scatters in this strange market?
There is a post on the Oriental Fortune website that has resonated with many people: Knowing that it is difficult to make money on **, why do people always flock to **?There is only one fundamental reason, and that is that they all think that they are smarter than others.
Most people in this world overestimate their IQ, and this judgment is supported by many special studies - the problem is that people who see the conclusion of this study think that they are underestimating their own 12 out of 10.
We were born as human beings, and that's how shameless we are.
China Youth Daily once conducted a survey with 2,700 questionnaires, 6765% of college students estimate that they will earn millions a year within 10 years of graduation. I don't know how many of these people have applied for the civil service examination, but it is a bit difficult to achieve this goal as a civil servant. I don't know how many of these people like **, they don't have the confidence to earn millions a year, and they really can't afford to raise the hobby.
Of course, there are people who have a strong sense of self, know the bias of self-perception, and also know how to reflect on themselves. But when lowering the self-evaluation of IQ, they will overestimate their luck.
You must know that luck is even less reliable than IQ.
Luck usually becomes a small scattered backstabber. If you lose money, you won't reflect on your IQ, but you will blame your bad luck for your luck.
So don't sympathize with the small scattered people who are tossed to death by the market. I never sympathized with myself. We are all because we believe that we are smarter than others - this is a kind of self-confidence that is not good - in order to make other people's money on this platform.
I'm a more rational person, I think I've discovered the secret of "smartness" in **, so I plan to reverse the routine of other people's cleverness: I'll wait for smart people to make mistakes, pick up their chips, bloody chips.
Am I bad?
For this reason, I have developed the strange problem of not being Xi in ***. Because I couldn't find bloody chips in the bull market, and all the chips shone with silver taels, I was blinded.
So, will I make a lot of money when the bear market comes?
Nor did it. When it came to the bear market, I realized that there were worse people than me - they were waiting for my chips.
* A wave is lower than a wave, and the "bad guys" are higher than a mountain.
I admit that there are people who are much smarter than me, they are the great wisdom of "yellow finches behind", and I am the little wisdom of "praying mantis cicadas" - I am still overestimated by myself.
I was shot to death.
Come to your senses, just think about it, ** is life. **The trend chart hides the ups and downs of life and the gains and losses.
Finally answer the question: Is there an ultimate winner?I can say responsibly that yes, China's eternal winner is "listing".
You read that right, the ultimate winner is the verb "go public". As for who goes public, it doesn't matter, anyway, whoever goes public has to get a vote.
Original work, thank you for reading