The benefits within the system have always been the envy of employees in the private sector. In recent years, public institutions in some regions have begun to encourage in-service employees to leave their posts to start businesses, further deepening the gap between inside and outside the system. For example, Jiangsu and Shaanxi have successively introduced policies to leave their posts and start their own businesses, supporting civil servants and employees of public institutions to retain their jobs during the entrepreneurial period, and the benefits remain unchanged. In the private sector, not only is it difficult for employees to retain their positions and benefits, but even sick leave is considered a "missed job". In the system, they are regarded as "being a person" and enjoy the holidays and benefits stipulated by the state.
However, despite the attractive benefits within the system, few people are willing to take the initiative to sign up to start a business, which has sparked widespread discussion. Some people believe that the salary remains the same for six years after leaving the job to start a business, which means that you can lie flat and save the pain of commuting to work. However, in practice, "no change" only means that the benefits remain the same, not the salary. In addition, there are workplace risks within the system, and if you are satisfied with your current position and salary, leaving will mean increasing the risk of change. There is no guarantee that there will be a change in policy in the future, and there may be other problems when returning to the system. Therefore, people who lack sufficient confidence and entrepreneurial conditions are likely to not have enough income when applying to leave their jobs to start a business, but also bear the risk of subsequent variables. Such benefits are more suitable for people with roots.
Although the system's encouragement of leaving the job to start a business has not had a significant impact on ordinary migrant workers, from another perspective, this policy reveals some trends. First of all, the size of the staffing is already quite large, and there is a need for reduction. In the past, the liquidation of non-staff contractors was intended to gradually shift these tasks to establishment staff. Encouraging entrepreneurship within the system is also a way to reduce the number of staff. Although there are very few people who take the initiative to sign up, some personnel will be launched in the end to cooperate with the implementation of the policy. In the case of failure to start a business, whether it can keep its original position has also become a problem, which indirectly reflects the increase in financial pressure within the system.
At the same time, many industries outside the system are also facing development bottlenecks, and smart people are needed to participate in and guide entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship not only expands market demand, but also increases employment. However, starting a business is both risky and opportunity, and it requires courage and capital, so not everyone is willing to sign up. In particular, people with small backgrounds and little capital with limited resources are more reluctant to take risks, while those with certain strength, such as university professors and scientific researchers, although they meet the scope of entrepreneurship, the free resources they enjoy make them reserved about leaving their jobs to start a business.
The policy of encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship in the system is not only a simple advocacy of entrepreneurship, but also a response to financial pressure within the system. This policy aims to reduce the number of staff, optimize the allocation of resources, promote the development of entrepreneurship, and expand market demand and increase employment through entrepreneurship. However, entrepreneurship is not affordable and successful for everyone, and sufficient confidence and capital are required. For workers outside the system, the benefits within the system are still incomparable, so not everyone is willing to take the risk of leaving the job to start a business. In addition, work within the system is relatively stable, and leaving means taking the risk of change, and not necessarily keeping the same position. Therefore, before choosing to leave the job to start a business, individuals need to weigh the pros and cons and make careful decisions.
In short, the policy of encouraging off-the-job entrepreneurship within the system reflects the gap between the system and the system, as well as the need to cope with financial pressures within the system. While this policy is attractive, it's not everyone's right to leave their jobs to start a business. Individuals need to make informed choices based on their own conditions and circumstances, clarifying their goals and risk tolerance.