Education is the key to social development, and how to reduce students' homework burden and realize the return of education to campus has become an important topic in the current education reform. In the past few years, China has implemented a "double reduction" policy aimed at reducing the workload of students and bringing education back to school. Among them, the "52" after-school service, as a supplementary measure to the "double reduction" policy, aims to provide opportunities for students' hobbies and hobbies to develop and develop in an all-round way. However, in practice, it has become a bad service, leading to dissatisfaction among students, parents and teachers. This article will discuss the actual situation of "52" after-school services, and call for attention to the voices of students, parents and teachers.
52 "After-school services were originally designed to reduce students' academic workload and provide opportunities for students to develop their hobbies. However, the current after-school services have deviated from their original intentions. Due to the lack of space and teachers, many schools have turned after-school services into tutoring homework and even teaching new classes, resulting in students not reducing their learning time. This is contrary to the original intention of the "double reduction" policy, and has also caused dissatisfaction among students, parents and teachers.
According to a survey of after-school services for primary and secondary school students, more than 70% of the services are homework help, more than 60% are hosting and writing, and only 183% of the service is to take a new class. This shows that the current after-school service is more like a tutoring institution that continues on-campus learning, and does not actually reduce the workload of students.
1.Students' learning pressure and time schedule: Students leave school early and have long after-school service hours, which leads to increased learning pressure on students. At the same time, after-school service hours conflict with parents' commuting times, causing inconvenience to families.
2.Financial pressure on parents: In some schools, after-school services are now implemented for a fee, increasing the financial burden on families. In this case, it is difficult for parents to be satisfied with the existence of after-school services.
3.Teachers' workload: Teachers have to work overtime after school because the actual content of after-school services is tutoring homework and teaching new lessons, etc., which increases their workload.
In summary, the dissatisfaction of students, parents and teachers with after-school services is mainly manifested in the increase of academic pressure, financial pressure and work pressure.
The deflection of after-school services has created many problems for education reform. First of all, after-school services do not really reduce the burden of schoolwork on students, but rather exacerbate the pressure on school education. Secondly, the after-school services have also increased the financial burden of students' families, which is contrary to the original intention of the "double reduction" policy. Finally, the current situation of after-school services has also increased the workload of teachers, resulting in educational reforms that are not as effective as expected.
As a result, there are growing calls for the abolition of after-school extended services. In a survey, more than 60% of people chose to cancel after-school services, indicating that there is a large gap between people's expectations and actual operation. The elimination of after-school services can reduce the academic pressure on students, ease the financial pressure on families, and contribute to the smooth progress of education reform.
Education is the cornerstone of social development, and reducing students' homework burden and returning education to campus are important topics in the current education reform. However, the "52" after-school service, as a supplementary measure to the "double reduction" policy, has changed its taste. The actual operation of after-school services is contrary to expectations, leading to high levels of dissatisfaction among students, parents and teachers. How to solve the problem of after-school services, reduce the academic pressure of students, and reduce the financial burden of families is worthy of our deep thought. Only by truly paying attention to the development of students and implementing measures to reduce the burden can education return to school and truly benefit students, parents and society.