The new regulations in the United States came into effect, the qualification of $7,500 was exempted, and the price of cabbage in China has risen?
Now, not only the European Union wants to point fingers at Chinese electric vehicle companies, but even the United States, a good old man.
Last December, the old U.S. enacted a new rule detailing the local sourcing of batteries, and batteries will not be eligible for tax credits for U.S. electric vehicles in the event of non-compliance (e.g. not from local sources).
Now, the United States has officially declared this new rule null and void.
Surprisingly, however, some EVs lost their eligibility for subsidies of up to $7,500 after the new regulations came into effect. The reason is that they do not strictly adhere to local battery regulations in the United States. This includes Tesla's various models, as well as cars from Japan and other countries.
And according to U.S. regulations, if these manufacturers don't submit information about eligible vehicles, then the subsidy program won't have much to do with them. But despite this, most car companies don't seem to be doing much.
Maybe it was the discovery of China"Cabbage price"。
In fact, everyone understands that the United States' move is not simply to promote the localization of electric vehicles in the United States, but more to exclude Chinese battery companies in the process. After all, in their opinion, it is taboo for core technology to rely so much on mainland manufacturers.
There is also the fact that Chinese manufacturers already have a say in the field of electric vehicles, and if they continue to expand the voice of the ** chain, it will be difficult to dominate the field of electric vehicles.
Therefore, they first ** battery.
But nowadays, many car companies are reluctant to apply for local tax subsidies, that is, under the subsidy, they choose the Chinese manufacturer's. The reason for this is that ** is an important factor.
We are familiar with BYD, CATL, etc., which have many advantages over other companies in terms of excellence. Perhaps, in the eyes of other car giants, this"Cabbage price"The advantages far outweigh the subsidies given by the United States.
Of course, this also makes sense, after all, the technical strength and scale of local battery manufacturers in the United States are incomparable to Chinese manufacturers. It's just that they don't want to admit that they are in this regard"Backward"What they hope is that tax policy and other related policies will struggle a bit.
This is to be expected. The advantages of Chinese batteries in technology and technology are a foregone conclusion. On this basis, many foreign auto giants intend to transform into the electric vehicle market, which is also one of the priorities of the mainland market.
In order to expand their own market, it is impossible to exclude the ** chain of Chinese enterprises. At the same time, the market for electric vehicles in the United States is not very large, and there are many people in the United States who oppose the mandatory introduction of electric vehicles. In their opinion, gasoline cars are their time.
Therefore, in my personal opinion, no matter how costly the subsidies they provide, it may be difficult to shake the status of China's battery technology. Perhaps in this regard, it can also be said to be unwarranted damage to the companies of allies, and the current car companies in the European market are a good example.
What do you think? Feel free to leave a message, like and share!