At noon yesterday Beijing time, Saudi Arabia publicly stated that Israel must stop its aggression against the Gaza Strip and demand that all Israeli troops withdraw from the Gaza Strip, otherwise Saudi Arabia will not establish diplomatic relations with Israel.
If Saudi Arabia were to make such a request, it might be an attitude to the current situation, but Saudi Arabia had come up with a condition that Israel would allow the Palestinians to establish an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
What the border looked like in 1967, see the map below. The one in the middle is the area under the actual control of the Palestinians and Israelis before the Third Middle East War, and the one on the right is the current situation between Palestine and Israel. Based on the 1967 borders, it would be very difficult for Israel to spit out large swathes of the West Bank, not to mention the fact that there is a large area of Palestinian-controlled territory in the middle that has been divided into almost three by Israel, not to mention that these areas have been established as settlements by Israel. At this time, no matter who becomes the prime minister of Israel, he does not dare to agree to this condition, and whoever agrees will fall on the spot, and he will not want to come to power again in the future. At that time, Rabin was only a formal compromise and his life was not guaranteed, and if Netanyahu dared to sign on this condition, the ancestral grave would have to be dug up by the Israelis.
From the Palestinian point of view, if he agrees to this plan, it means that he has made huge concessions, and he will not say a lot of concessions, and once an agreement with Israel is reached, it means that he will lose the legal basis for wanting to return the large tracts of land occupied by Israel.
The reason why I say this first is because the Palestinian side of the two-state solution is willing to compromise at the moment. Israel resolutely refuses, and the United States has always stood firmly on Israel's side.
But on January 31, U.S. spokesman Matthew seemed to be relenting at a regular press conference, saying that the U.S. is considering recognizing the two-state solution. Of course, this does not mean that the United States will abandon Israel, but it indicates that it may make a strategic retrenchment in the Middle East, as the withdrawal of an aircraft carrier battle group from the Middle East and the withdrawal of illegal US military bases from Syria have already demonstrated to some extent.
As for why this is done, it is that the United States believes that there is no one in the Middle East that can pose a real challenge to the United States or even Israel, not even Iran and Turkey.
In the European direction, 3 days ago, on February 5, Polish Defense Minister Kameš said in an interview with Poland that the possibility of a war with Russia is not ruled out, and Poland must be prepared for such a war.
This statement sends two messages: one is that the Ukrainian side may be almost unable to hold on; Second, Poland should play the role of the West's anti-Russian front.
As a member of NATO, Kamesh used the word "we" in response to a reporter's question about what to do if Poland loses the war against Russia. Daring to use it like this, Poland was also very cooperative and did not ask about the specific meaning of the word "we", which implied that his interview speech not only represented Poland, but also represented NATO and even the United States.
Around the same time, the German Defense Ministry also said it was ready for war with Russia after Ukraine's defeat.
Poland and Germany, the countries that have invited the United States to station troops and the other countries whose military sovereignty is in the hands of the United States, are clearly representing the will of the United States when their official military institutions say such things.
So what exactly does the United States want?
A warning to Russia should be the easiest thing to think of, but judging from Russia's overall performance in the Russian-Ukrainian war, he does not have the strength to wage a full-scale war with the United States and NATO. So this kind of warning seems somewhat redundant.
There is only one other possibility: the United States needs someone to contain Russia in Europe so that it can focus its strategy elsewhere. This place can only be East Asia, and the opponent to deal with can only be us.
You must know that the basis of US hegemony is in three aspects: military, science and technology, and finance. We are the only ones who can pose a real threat to the United States in these three areas.
Militarily, the United States has tried many times, and it is certain that the steel plate kicked by us is getting harder and harder.
In terms of science and technology, although the dominant position of the United States is still there, its absolute superiority no longer exists, and if we are given time, it is almost certain that the two sides will exchange their positions.
In the financial field, the speed of RMB internationalization is obviously accelerating, and some time ago, we dared to fully open up foreign capital into banking and insurance, which sent chills down the spine of the United States. Because the rise of the United States is directly related to the stride of capital from Britain to the United States at the beginning of the last century.
At present, counting the USS Reagan aircraft carrier anchored at the Yokosuka base in Japan, the number of US aircraft carriers operating in our vicinity has reached three. They are certainly not here to steal oil, but to prepare for war.
Whether from the perspective of US hegemonic interests or from the perspective of race, culture, and religious belief, the United States has already regarded us as an imaginary enemy that must be resolved, and as far as we are concerned, there is no option for Japan to surrender and lose half of the way without shame, not to mention that we simply cannot do it, and the United States cannot agree to it. Even if we are dismembered, the United States will not rest assured, because reunification is political correctness engraved in our genes.
So it's time for us to prepare for the worst, don't imagine that the United States will be bound by any morality when it uses nuclear **, if you really want to be embarrassed, it is impossible for the United States to maintain its hegemony until now.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program