Years later, facing Hasselblad, the second lieutenant will recall the distant afternoon when he took him to meet Lieutenant General Kannon 28-70 F2L USM.
Lieutenant General Guanyin still remembers the distorted face of the second lieutenant in the mud pit, and he roared: You don't talk about martial arts, you come to deceive, and come to attack my 107-year-old comrade. Lieutenant General Guanyin smiled faintly: I'm not targeting you.
Yes, the scum can do have the confidence to say this, before the appearance of 28-70, the standard change mirror emperor is actually controversial, 24-70 f28 are all strong hands, after all, they are the benchmark works of the brand. But when the 28-70 F2L USM came out, it all became a doubt, because it was really too powerful for other standard variants to look up to.
In fact, I have used a lot of standard transformers in various companies, and I have used the Canon 24-70 f2 for a long time8 L II USM, Canon 24-70 F4 L IS USM, and Sony 24-70 F28 G Master, and now I only keep 24-70 F4L is USM, because for landscape shooting, F4 is actually enough, plus it has image stabilization and macro functions, which is quite useful. As for Sony, the current equipment is FX6 and FX30*2, and the lens is Sony 10-20mm F4, Sigma 24 Art DG DN, 35 Art DG DN, 50 Art DG DN, 85 Art DG DN, 105 Art DG DB Macro, and 135 Art DG. Its practical Sigma fixed focus is very cost-effective, in the past, the three large three yuan were more than 30,000, and now the 6 fixed focus is almost the same price, but the image quality is on a higher level (before the Sony system used three generation G master large three yuan, 35 1.4 GM and Sony 90 macro, fuselage is FX3, FX30, A7R3*2).
As for Canon, there are indeed a lot of body and lenses, but there is no RF lens, all of them are EF adapters, because I feel that there is no performance loss on the adapter, and even better performance of EF bull head.
Of course, theoretically speaking, the RF lens can better play the strength of R3 and R6, so I am thinking about what lens to buy, I basically have ordinary zoom and fixed focus, so I am considering the lens that the EF system does not have, so there is RF52/f2.8L Dual Fishey (such a bizarre lens to play can't understand -20 F4L is USM (with Sigma 14-24 28 art, and there were not so many opportunities to shoot such a vast landscape - 105 28L is usm (too expensive......）rf200-800/f6.3-9 is usm (Canon 400 28lii as well as Sigma 800 56 can be replaced by -300 f28L is USM (too expensive - 500 F4.)5-7.1L is USM (Canon White Rabbit can be used as an alternative to the F11 IS STM and 800 F11 IS STM (with the Sigma 800 5.)6 Alternative to F8L is USM (too expensive to afford......Then all that can be considered is the 28-70mm F2L USM, a lens that has never had such specifications, not the focal length (after all, the previous standard change had 28-70), but the unprecedented F2 super aperture! And the focal length is very practical, with a large aperture, high quality, that's it.
In terms of MTF, the Canon 28-70 F2L maintains a very high level of quality (of course, the test method may be different for each company, so it can only be used as a reference), but even if it is only compared to its own 24-70 F2Compared to 8L, 28-70 has a larger aperture, but it still plays back and forth, and even wins in some aspects, so it is conceivable that if 28-70 F2L receives 28 aperture will inevitably crush 24-70 f28l.
High quality inevitably brings a large volume, which has a maximum diameter and length of about 1038×139.8 mm, the filter diameter is 95mm, and the weight is 1430 grams. And the relative RF 24-70 F2The specification of 8L IS USM is 885×125.7 mm, the filter diameter is 82mm, and the weight is 900 grams. Even with longer focal lengths of 24-105mm f2The 8L IS USM weighs only 1330 grams, which shows how mad it is. The lens adopts an optical structure of 19 elements in 13 groups, including one super UD and two UD lenses, equipped with high-precision grinding aspherical lenses, and adopts SWC sub-wavelength structure coating and ASC coating, which can be said to be a model of stacking. Therefore, its ** far exceeds that of F28 of the standard change lens, the official ** reached 22499, and the ** of offline store licensed goods also exceeded 210 thousand.
The 28-70 F2L is still an outward zoom design, but with a small amount of extension, if it can be like the 24-105 F28L is even better with an internal zoom design. One of the features of the RF system that I appreciate is that the lens has an integrated control ring, which can be easily set to aperture, shutter, ISO or ** compensation according to your needs, without having to operate on the camera body while shooting.
The feel and workmanship of Canon's high-end lenses are unquestionable, very supple and delicate. The minimum focusing distance of 28-70 f2L is 0At 39 meters, it can also meet most shooting needs, of course, it would be nice to be able to provide macro function like the 24-70 F4L IS, but unfortunately everything is not perfect.
Because the end of the year is very busy, after buying it on January 30th, I took some **and** on the second night, and since then I have been busy with work and preparing for the New Year, and I'm just an equipment player, **Please understand the general shooting.
A simple review of the Canon RF28-70 F2L USM:
1. The quality is very high, although the knife sharp milk is a little excessive, but it is indeed worthy of the title of the Emperor of the Standard Change.
2. The focus is fast and accurate, the breathing effect is small, and the player is ecstatic.
3. Although the lens does not have an IS structure, it can achieve 8 levels of image stabilization with RF mirrorless with body image stabilization.
Some regrets: 1. It is not an internal zoom design.
2. It's a bit heavy.
3. There is no tripod ring, and it is not good to get on the stabilizer.
Some digressions:
After buying the lens, I had a heated discussion with my friends about whether Canon would launch a super ternary, and he thought that under the current limitations of USM motors, it would be difficult to launch a super ternary, especially a monster spec like the 70-200 F2, maybe the 28-70 F2L is just the only one. And I think there is still a chance, and the super ternary focal length should not be limited to the -200 that we are used to, at the f2 aperture, I personally think that the more reasonable focal length may be 16-28 f2l, 28-70 f2l (-150 f2l already exists, I don't know what everyone thinks?).