If the car plug can also make up a history, then the Mercedes-Benz car plug incident, in the "car plug history", should be a very ordinary one, but what is unexpected is that this matter has caused a lot of uproar, causing continuous attention and discussion.
While there are no two exactly the same gasser events in the world, each time has its own unique features, butBecause of the small nature of the matter, even if it is a little noisy, it will quickly disappear and little attention from others。Why is the Mercedes-Benz car jam incident abnormal, making the tree want to be quiet and the wind does not stop?
Now, Mrs. Xu's daughter said that they were subjected to cyberbullying, and she hopes that this will end and no longer speak out on this matter. But many netizens held on, which can be described as a tree that wants to be quiet and the wind does not stop. The reason has to be said is mainly because Ms. Xu is self-defeating and adds fuel to the fire.
Note to the public: Penalties will not be reversed
Now the "reversal" theory circulating on the Internet has been made a little vague by some people, causing many people to misunderstand, thinking that they are questioning the punishment of **, which is to whitewash the Mercedes-Benz car, and also said that the Mercedes-Benz car has found a water army.
But that's not the case. The public should understand somethingThe so-called reversal is only a partial reversal, not a reversal of the penaltyNow, instead of questioning the penalty, Ms. Xu is criticized for lying
In this incident, the owner of the Mercedes-Benz stopped the car, cursed people, and smashed the car, which is the reason why he was detained and fined. **Penalties are awarded regardless of who added the plug. **The judgment has a factual basis, a legal basis, and is completely correct.
Shift in focus: Ms. Xu lied
Regarding the Mercedes-Benz car plugging incident, in fact, the focus of netizens' attention has shifted. **The penalty was recognized, and netizens admitted that Mercedes-Benz owners should be punished。The focus of netizens' attention now is that Ms. Xu is lying.
First, the driver was not Mrs. Xu, but Ms. Xu openly told reporters that it was her mother who was driving at the time. Second, Ms. Xu now blatantly denies what she said before, saying that she did not say that her mother is a driver.
These are two lies. The first lie has already made netizens angry, but I didn't expect her to "lie a lot" again and blatantly deny what she said before! This made countless netizens even more indignant, so they grabbed it.
Not whitewashing: Ms. Xu should apologize
Some people misunderstood and regarded netizens' criticism of Ms. Xu as deliberately diverting attention and wanting to whitewash the Mercedes-Benz. This understanding is the embodiment of simple thinking, and I don't understand the simple truth that whoever is at fault is responsible.
Ms. Xu lied twice in a row, especially the second one was very serious, because it involved ** credibility issues, so netizens were very angry. In the eyes of most netizens, her behavior is more harmful than that of Mercedes-Benz owners.
What Ms. Xu said before is now circulating on the Internet, and if she has ears and normal hearing, she can hear it. The evidence is overwhelming and cannot be denied. Therefore, netizens' criticism is justified, and netizens hope that Ms. Xu will apologize publicly.
Support reporters: Maintain credibility
On the issue of Ms. Xu's continuous lying, it should be viewed from a higher perspective, not just from the perspective of personal morality. She blatantly lied, of course, it was her personal moral problem, but she denied what she said, which endangered the credibility of reporters and **, which is not a trivial matter.
If the reporter did not leave the recording evidence, the matter may not be clear, and the reporter jumped into the Yellow River and could not wash it. She can slander reporters for making things up. She seems to have said that. If the reporter does not leave evidence of the recording, the public may also be misled by her, suspicious of the reporter, suspicious of **.
Think about it, if such a situation is formed, is it very serious? Isn't the credibility of the news ** greatly reduced? Isn't the loss of credibility of journalism a disaster for our society as a whole? Wouldn't each of us be affected?
That's why we support journalistsI hope that the reporter will ask Ms. Xu for an explanation, and the reporter has the right to ask Ms. Xu to retract the second lie and apologize。Therefore, Ms. Xu should apologize to the reporter, apologize to the society, and take responsibility for her wrong remarks.