Recently, the new regulations of the express delivery industry have a greater impact on the express brothers, and they have become the biggest victims. However, in the discussion on the Internet, some people seem to have deliberately instigated the conflict between the courier brother and the consumer, which has led to a lot of irrational remarks and mutual accusations.
This phenomenon is clearly neither objective nor rational, and some of these statements seem to justify the capitalists, ignoring the essential causes of the problem. First of all, the decline in the salary of the courier brother is not entirely due to the implementation of the new regulations, but the deeper reason is the squeezing of capital. Courier companies are a lucrative industry, but they are unwilling to provide better treatment for their employees, which is the root of the problem.
However, some people have a different view. They believe that if the courier brother leaves, the courier service will be affected or delayed. However, there is no logical basis for this view. In fact, in order to maintain the stability of the express delivery business, express delivery companies will take a variety of ways to maintain the efficiency of express delivery, such as expanding the workforce or improving employee benefits. Moreover, some courier companies have already started to implement home delivery services, which is further proof of their ability to respond to change.
This is not the case with some claims that policies do not take into account reality. Most policies are fine, and these voices often either ignore the facts or deliberately misinterpret them, giving the impression of ill intentions.
In short, arguments such as lower salaries leading to the departure of couriers and suspicions of policy problems are untenable. These arguments are either intended to attract public attention or have other ulterior motives. However, there is a growing voice, which is calling for a price increase to ease the work pressure of couriers. Price increases are an inevitable consequence of the market economy, and if the revenue of express companies increases, they will naturally pass on the cost to consumers. However, the premise of the price increase is the improvement of service quality, and if the service of the courier company cannot meet the needs of consumers, they will lose the market.
Also, there are concerns that home delivery services will cause couriers to lose their jobs, but I don't agree with this view. I think that home delivery services not only do not lead to job losses for couriers, but are beneficial for the stability of the couriers' status. If you rely entirely on courier stations, robots may take over the job of couriers as technology develops. Therefore, courier companies need to seriously consider their service quality and best strategy to avoid getting into trouble.
In general, we must not be misled by some remarks, the root of the treatment of the courier brother is the exploitation of capital and vicious competition, not the excessive demands of consumers. The key to solving this problem is to change the oppressive behavior of capital, rather than blaming the courier brother. It is hoped that the express company can take the interests of employees seriously, provide better treatment, and be a responsible enterprise.
Finally, I would like to ask a question: why are courier companies reluctant to provide better treatment for their employees? Do they have the ability to provide better pay and benefits to their employees? In fact, the annual net profit and market value of express companies are quite impressive, why can't they use part of the profits to improve the treatment of employees? Does this mean the ugly face of the capitalists? We need to think deeply about this issue.