Controversy Project
In China's education system, political review has always been a controversial part. In addition to special schools such as police academies and military academies, political censorship is also required in the college entrance examination and public examination. This link is an insurmountable obstacle for many people, and even if the results are good, they may not be able to work in the system because of political review problems.
The political review has been controversial, and many students and parents are confused and puzzled: "It's not my fault, why should I be asked to pay?" "In fact, the political review is not intended to embarrass students, but takes into account the special responsibilities of civil servants, and it is necessary to ensure that their political orientation and family background meet national standards to avoid potential risks. Political review is not only a procedure, but also a responsible choice for future civil servants.
Education should be fair and just, but political review seems to break this principle. The reason why the political examination exists is that the connection between the education system and the vocational system is not close enough, and it is necessary to ensure the political quality and reliability of civil servants through political examination. However, it also exposes some problems in the education system, such as what is the ultimate goal of education? Is it to cultivate the comprehensive quality of students, or simply to pursue the promotion rate and high scores?
The existence of the political review link reflects the disconnect between the current education system and the vocational system. In the future, we need to solve this problem by reforming the education system. First of all, education should pay more attention to the cultivation of students' comprehensive quality and ability, rather than just the pursuit of scores. Second, a more rigorous and scientific evaluation mechanism should be established to ensure the political quality and reliability of civil servants. Finally, society should pay more attention to educational equity to ensure that every student has an equal opportunity to receive education and is not discriminated against on the basis of family background.
As a selection mechanism, political review can indeed filter out some potential risk factors to a certain extent and ensure the political quality and reliability of the civil servants. However, there are also some problems and controversies in the political trial. First, political trials can be unfair. Some students may be eliminated because of family background or kinship problems, which is partly contrary to the principle of educational equity. Second, political review may increase the psychological burden on students and families. Many students and parents may feel anxious and stressed because of political issues, which is not conducive to the healthy development of students. Finally, the political trial may also create the problem of the loss of talents. Some outstanding students may choose to give up domestic employment opportunities and choose overseas development because of political problems, which is not good for the country's talent pool.
Therefore, we should re-examine the mechanism of political review and try to find a more fair and reasonable selection method. ** Consider establishing a more scientific and rigorous evaluation system, not only focusing on political quality, but also taking into account the comprehensive ability and potential of students. At the same time, it can also reduce the unfairness caused by political review by strengthening educational equity and providing equal educational opportunities for every student. In general, as a selection mechanism, political review needs to pay more attention to fairness and rationality while maintaining political security, so as to truly play a role in promoting talent development.