Whether it was the US-Soviet hegemony in the past, or the Sino-US game today, it is a comprehensive struggle intertwined with a series of large and small events, this kind of struggle is as gentle and delicate as romance, and as fierce and sharp as a mountain fire and thunderbolt, China and the United States look at each other's eyes, like a quiet tiger sniffing a bush of thorny roses, brave and cautious.
Clause.
First, the United States. What is the overall strategy of the United States?
In the eyes of many people, the United States likes to be flamboyant and does not pay attention to strategy, but in fact this is not the case at all. It can deploy so many military bases around the world, as its extensive and powerful strategic fulcrum, can control the economic lifeline of various countries through the global ** system, can make the military cooperate with finance, continue to harvest the wealth of the people of most countries, and can start to build three island chains decades ago, blockading the infant New China, to say that this layout is a lack of strategic thinking, no one will believe it. This is the layout of the older generation of strategists in the United States, and is it true that the new generation of politicians is inferior to their predecessors? I don't think so. At a time when global hotspots are frequent, and wars and conflicts are occurring one after another, the United States has focused on Asia, to be precise, on China's eastern maritime frontier. Morality aside, from the perspective of US hegemony, this kind of fall is steady and ruthless. So, does the United States dare to set the tables with China?
I believe that this is a question that many people are thinking about and researching. In the blogger's view, this is not the heart of the matter. If I were an American politician or think tank, would I dare to go to war with China? When was the war with China? Neither. There is only one core question I want to think about: how to delay the speed of China's development to the greatest extent. Why?
Because if the United States dares to go to war, what does the United States not dare? The United States is the world's largest military power, has a huge nuclear arsenal and global military capabilities, has the broadest military alliance NATO as its military backing, has the world's most developed countries alliance as its economic backing, has more than 300 military bases around China, still holds the hegemony of the US dollar in its hands, and has Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and other minions to take the lead in it.
If you want to ask when you will start a war with China, you can do so at any time, and the United States can be said to be the most professional war planning master in the world today. Even if you don't play yourself, you can brew a war by using a little brother as a gunman. There are ways to encourage Ukraine to join NATO, Israel to bully Gaza, the Philippines to forcibly occupy Ren'ai Jiao, Japan to drain water, South Korea to arrange THAAD, and India to attack and harass southern Tibet.
There is only one core problem, and that is: how to delay the speed of China's development to the greatest extent. So why not bring down China, or break it up as it did against the USSR? The answer is simple, they tried, but they really couldn't do it. China's strong cohesion and ability to organize and mobilize have made the United States daunting, and at the same time strengthened its determination to slow the dragon's take-off. This is completely different from our thousand-year-old neighbor, Japan. Japan also has only one goal, but his goal: to eat the dragon. For this goal, he will be very eager for a hearty life-and-death duel between China and the United States, and only this battle can get rid of the chains of the United States at the same time, and can take the opportunity to bite the injured dragon. Of course, the United States will do its best to avoid allowing Japan's tricks to succeed, because there are more than one or two countries that share Japan's intentions.
If the United States wants to avoid being used by its allies to consume China, it must not have a real hot war with China; However, in order to contain China's development, the United States must rush to the front line of anti-China; If you want to encourage your allies to come into conflict with China, you must first make all kinds of provocative and dangerous moves; In order to prevent misfire with China, it is necessary to communicate with China in advance and find out China's bottom line and red line. It is necessary to play with fire in the forest without causing wildfires, so that China cannot understand its own psychological trends, and at the same time, it is necessary to exert a substantial deterrent to China and delay the pace of expanding its sphere of influence on the eastern front. This size is extremely difficult to handle. However, this is exactly the game that the tiger of the United States is playing at the moment to sniff the roses.
Clause.
Second, look at China again. Will China dare to be the rose that is being looked down upon? Of course not. In the eyes of China and the United States, the other party is a rose in their own eyes, and they are the gentle and sharp tiger. It's just that China, as the champion, does not have the psychological baggage of a "defender" like the United States, and it is a big deal to start all over again, anyway, we Chinese have come from poverty and weakness, and there is nothing to be afraid of. However, China also has its own weaknesses, that is, the homeland that has not yet been recovered and the grand goals of the centenary of our founding. Twenty-six years to go before our first centenary goal, if we can avoid getting bogged down in a major war, we will be able to devote ourselves to construction and take off successfully in the first centenary. In the last two decades of this first century, we need to build not only the economy, but also the rule of law and culture. Then some people ask, should we try to compromise in order to avoid war? Bloggers believe that quite the opposite.
From the point of view of common sense, when a wolf roars at you, if you choose to compromise, it will attract a group of wolves to besiege you, and when a group of wolves surround you, if you still choose to back down, you will be narrowed and eventually lose your life. The only correct thing to do is to kill the first wolf when it roars at you, and even if you can't, make it pay a heavy price. Even if you don't have the ability to hurt the wolf, you have to take a desperate stance with him, so that he doesn't dare to act rashly.
In the face of the United States' fierce eye, when our military strength is insufficient, we need to overwhelm the opponent with the momentum of the desperate Saburo, and after our strength increases, we must seize every opportunity to squeeze the opponent's room for maneuver. We have seen that since the beginning of this year, our military's performance has been encouraging, and in the face of all kinds of provocative attempts from the South China Sea, the Yellow Sea, and the Taiwan Strait, all of them have been smashed one by one, and we have won more say in diplomacy. We have been able to successfully play a good offices role in a number of conflicts because of our military prerogatives. You know, without letting the elites of the world see China's hard power for themselves, how can they easily listen to our persuasion? When it's your turn to show your strength, don't drop the chain, otherwise, it will trigger a series of chain reactions that you can't imagine. This is also the fundamental reason why the United States is still struggling to support Russia and Ukraine, in Palestine and Israel, and in the West even if the economy is in trouble, because when it is the turn of the United States to show its strength, he cannot afford to lose the chain.
So what is China's core goal in this Sino-US game? Is it thinking about when to go to war with the United States? Is it to think about how to eliminate the United States? Of course not. Our core goal is to do our utmost to peacefully take over the new order of the future world. And for the sake of this peaceful handover, we must prepare for the worst-case scenario of war with the United States. Isn't that a contradiction? Not contradictory. As the defending champion, the United States, when it loses the crown, is very likely to gamble on its national fortunes, just like Britain and Japan in the past, they will not be willing to abdicate if they do not let go. In order to prevent the worst from happening, in addition to other "artistic" means, only by constantly and rapidly increasing our military and economic strength and forming an overwhelming and irreversible advantage over the United States can we completely lose the courage to flip the table and be willing to be a delicate rose.
The game between China and the United States is undoubtedly a contest of art and strength, a contest between the strategists of the two countries, and a contest between the two peoples, and it is ultimately a contest between the two systems, the American system, which is the leader of mankind in the first 100 years, and the Chinese system, which is the leader of the future leader, whether the United States can lead the course of human history again through self-improvement, and whether China can take over from the United States through self-improvement and lead mankind on a new path. The first question facing China and the United States is who can make the world more peaceful. The second is who can make the world richer under the premise of peace. There is a tiger in the heart, sniffing the rose.
Okay, about my analysis of the brave and cautious posture shown by China and the United States in the game, if you have anything to refute or add, please feel free to discuss and share with you in the comment area, if you also like my article **, remember**, follow or give me a "highly recommended" support. If you want to show your support to the blogger by tipping, you can find the appreciation button to encourage the article. **10,000 Fans Incentive Plan