Time flies, and less than three months have passed in the blink of an eye. With the arrival of March, students have entered the beginning of the school season, and in less than three monthsProspective candidates in the third year of high school are about to face the most important exam in their lives - the college entrance examination.
Mid-term performance in the gaokao can often be indicative of the final result. In order to realize their dreams through the college entrance examination, the students showed outstanding performance.
Dreams that have been buried since childhood, some people dream of becoming doctors, and some people dream of becoming police officers. Both professions are nobleIn my country, the way to become a police officer is relatively simple, as long as you can be admitted to the police academy, and then the police academy graduation rate is relatively high.
There are a total of 35 public security police academies in China, and the pass rate of these graduates can be as high as 90% after taking the public security joint examination. This provides a relatively clear and possible path for students who aspire to become police officers.
Although it means that students have a better chance of becoming a future police officer, admission to the police academy does not depend solely on a temporary offer. Not only do students need to make sure that their scores meet the admission threshold, but they also have to take the early approval pass check in advance. This process includes a medical examination and a political examination, both of which are steps that cannot be ignored.
Many students attach great importance to physical examinations and exam scores, and they believe that as long as they are in good health and have excellent grades, the political examination should just go through the motions, because as long as the candidates have not been involved in any major disciplinary issues, they can generally pass easily. However, this notion is actually very wrong.
Xiao Zhang, a college student, has dreamed of becoming a police officer since he was a child. He put in a lot of effort before the college entrance examination, not only to exercise hard and keep his eyes from being myopia, but also to show great diligence and hard work in his studies. In the end, he successfully passed the admission score of a certain police academy, which made him think that his dream was about to come true.
However, Xiao Zhang's joy suffered a heavy blow in the political trial. It turned out that Xiao Zhang's father had made a mistake when he was young and left a criminal record, which led to Xiao Zhang's failure in the political trial stage. For Xiao Zhang, this accident was like a bolt from the blue, which made it difficult for him to accept.
He felt aggrieved by his efforts, why did he pay so much, but he was treated unfairly because of his father's mistakes? So, he did not hesitate to question the political trial staff.
The political trial staff calmly and firmly responded to Xiao Zhang's question: if we all think that if the parents make mistakes, the children can be exempt from punishment, then we will only be more unscrupulous, and if the father makes a mistake and the children can be exempted from responsibility, then people may become less and less serious about the rules. And if you can make a fuss, how to manage it in the future?
This is not a needless process, but an important means of ensuring the moral and political integrity of future public officials. This approach is motivated by a sense of responsibility to society and to the standards expected of public officials.
In the future, these personnel will become the main force of the state in maintaining social stability and security. These positions require individuals to have a high level of responsibility, discipline and loyalty, qualities that are directly related to the overall well-being of the country and society.
Through the political review, those individuals who may have character problems or potential hidden dangers can be quickly screened out during the primary selection stage, thus ensuring the stability of the public sphere. There are two views on whether to cancel the political review.
On the one hand,Some people believe that the restrictions on political trials should be relaxed, believing that this can provide more capable people with public office opportunities, for example, Mr. Luo Xiang has put forward this view.
Others, on the other hand, are concerned that the abolition of political trials will increase the chances of committing crimes, because once restrictions are relaxed, some individuals with misconduct and potential risks may also be able to enter the public service, thus posing a potential threat to society. So which one do you support?
This article is all on the network contention plan, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.