Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
When it comes to human weakness, I believe there are many friends who have a deep understanding. The reason is that as long as you are human, you will have a weakness, although everyone's weakness is different. In today's society where life pressure is multiplied, the difference between having a weakness and not having a weakness is too great.
This can be illustrated by comparing middle-aged men with young people. If it is a middle-aged man who already has a family, then the family is a weakness. For a middle-aged man, the burden of the family must be carried as much as possible at any time.
Therefore, even in the current situation of particularly stressful life, middle-aged men can only grit their teeth and continue to walk. And dare not have the slightest relaxation and slackness. But this situation is different for the young people who love to lie flat and rot.
Because young people have not yet formed a family, it is not as difficult to support themselves as it is for middle-aged people. Therefore, the weakness of young people is undoubtedly very easy compared to the weakness of middle-aged people. Even some young people don't even have to think about how to support themselves.
Because as long as you gnaw at home, you can do it. In this way, the weakness of young people is in fact equivalent to almost zero. Then the problem arises, as long as the young people of the present day do not get married or have children, they do not enter the world of the secular world.
Will it never be handled? Actually, no, because people are social animals after all. As long as it is within the influence of human society, there will be the possibility of being manipulated by others. There's no doubt that no one is immune.
Although not getting married and having children may mean that the person is not subject to too many conditions, it must not be described as someone who can handle it. In other words, the social attributes of people have not changed. Man is also essentially a social animal.
As long as it is within the sphere of influence of human society, people will inevitably be limited by various conditions. This is an inevitable scenario. For example, in the case of social norms, living in human society will inevitably have to abide by a variety of norms.
This is true of morality, and so is the law. So no one can grasp this sentence, which is obviously more one-sided. More importantly, the various norms and orders in society were formed under the joint efforts of countless people, but they were manifested differently to the outside world.
However, from the point of view of substance, it is still a common norm that belongs to the individual. So it can also be used that although it is social norms that rule over human beings, in the final analysis, it is human beings themselves who rule human beings. Social norms are just universally accepted by the majority of the population.
On the other hand, it is clear that the main body of this concept is the broad masses of young people. Because among the young people who like to put on the sloppy and lie flat, it is a very common normal situation not to get married or have children, and at the same time try to avoid the exchange and development of human feelings.
It is worth mentioning that although it seems very free on the surface, there are still certain restrictions on the basis of not having children, not getting married, and not having human relations. This limitation is actually the subject itself. For example, birth background, family conditions;
For example, behavior, habits, blood relations, and so on. In these respects, it is practically difficult for people to escape. It's like people who were born in small places tend to struggle desperately when they are young, wanting to go to the big city and settle down in the big city.
However, when the prosperity is gone and the big dream is over, people will have a strong feeling of wanting to return to their familiar hometown. Although many people would call this choice a return to their homeland, why not make a certain amount of compromise?
So in terms of the current situation, it is no exception. Although this state of affairs may seem very free, there are still certain limitations. This restriction cannot be avoided. Although people are always admonishing themselves to learn to let go of everything.
But when it really comes to that juncture, how many people can always believe in the steadfastness in their hearts? Especially when other people's lives are enjoyable, will people who have not made such a choice continue to torture themselves in the depths of their hearts?
We should also note that not marrying, not having children, and not dealing with people is itself a relative freedom. Because whether you get married or have children, it is not a unified paradigm. Or to put it another way, this ordinary pattern can actually be imitated by others.
It's like there will always be some classmates in a class who are not good at learning. When this part of the people choose not to roll up on the track of learning, they are already making a relatively free choice. Because they choose to break away from the heavy learning.
When the choice is made, they are given a certain degree of freedom. In other words, if you don't get married or have children, no one can handle this matter, and it's no exception. In fact, the manipulation here can only be understood in terms of a weakness that is not so obvious.
We all know that although visiting relatives during the Chinese New Year is part of traditional culture, the process is actually very boring and boring every year. Because relatives who only meet once during the Chinese New Year are themselves destined not to have much deep connection and friendship with each other.
It's just that people often have to go because of their feelings and backgrounds. Therefore, from this point of view, the grasp here is actually nothing more than the inherent oppression of the actual culture. People actually have the right to escape from it.
To sum up, there is some rationality in this view, but at the same time it is very one-sided. When looking at this issue, we must undoubtedly insist on using dialectical thinking and vision to see the essence through phenomena. Only when we see the essence of the problem can we see it at a glance.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my articles, you can click "Follow" and receive the article push as soon as you become a fan.