If a person will only give you emotional value but not give you advice to get better, you must stay away from him, because he will not get anything beneficial to the future except for making your emotions constantly intensified and the whole person more and more extreme.- Kun Peng's theory
The year 2023 has passed like this, and a thousand words are finally summed up in one sentence:
As long as you live, there is nothing you can't bear, and there is no hurdle that you can't overcome!
Kun Penglun hereby sincerely wishes you all:
Be healthy and happy in 2024!
Volume IV, Chapter 7 (II).
Original:
Again, there are things in which the negation of one attribute is tantamount to the affirmation of the opposite end of the object, and it is said that there is also an interbody in such a class of things;
For example, in the mathematical range there is said to be a number that is neither "odd" nor "non-odd".
But this is clearly impossible by definition.
Explanation:
If something affirms one of its properties, it is also affirmed that it is the opposite of the opposite property, and they go so far as to say that there is also an interbody in such things, and for example, there is a number that is neither odd nor non-odd for the purposes of mathematical theory.
But that, by definition, is simply impossible.
Original:
Again, the process will go on endlessly, and the actual number will not only increase by half of the total, but will increase even more.
This will also make it possible for someone to deny this body as a comparison between the positive and negative ends, and thus create new objects that are not only other things, but also become a different set of things.
Explanation:
And it will go into infinity, and the number of real people will not only increase by half of its total, but it will increase even more.
For example, if there is an interbody B outside of A and non-A, it is neither A nor non-A, and there is also an interbody C, which is neither B nor non-B, and there is also an interbody D, which is neither C nor non-C, and so on, it will be endless.
Original:
Again, when a person is asked whether something is "white" and he says "no", what he denies is only "yes" (white).Its "not white" is a negative reversal.
Explanation:
Furthermore, when someone is asked whether something is white and he says no, what he denies is only white, and the part that is not white is not.
Original:
Again, there are those who acquire these ideas in the same way that they acquire other paradoxes;
When they cannot disprove a sophistry, they admit that argument and agree that the conclusions are true.
Explanation:
This opinion comes to some people just as other strange theories occur to others, and when they are unable to think of a solution to their sophistic reasoning, they give in to it and admit that their conclusions are true.
Original:
Some people express these thoughts because of this;
Others also express this idea because they demand that everything must be given a reason.
Explanation:
Some people preach this theory for this reason, others because they seek an explanation of everything.
Original:
To deal with all of this, people should start by establishing a "definition".
Explanation:
All such persons should be dealt with on a definition-based basis.
Original:
The reason why a definition is important is that it must be specified;
A formula made up of nouns draws the line between what is being explained.
Explanation:
Definitions are valued because they come from necessarily indicating something, and the definition formula of nouns demarcates all things that are explained.
Original:
The doctrine of Heraclitus, which regards everything as it is and what it is not, seems to make everything true;
And Anaxagoras, who sets up an intermediate between two opposites, seems to make all things false;
For when things are all mixtures, mixtures are neither good nor bad, so that no one can clearly identify a real thing.
Explanation:
When Heraclitus speaks, all things are and are not, seem to make all things true;
Anaxagoras's view that there is an intermediate between the contradictions (because his "mixture" can be called good or bad) makes it impossible for anyone to describe anything truthfully.
Aristotle refuted the views of Heraclitus and Anaxagoras.
Heraclitus believed that the world was in a state of eternal change, and that all things were and were not
Anaxagoras concluded that it seemed as if all were mixed into one.
Thus, according to the former, everything seems to be made true, and according to the latter, everything seems to be made false.
Aristotle, on the other hand, argues that the beginning of the debate lies in definition, and definition is to judge, and judgment must ensure the identity of the subject, and Heraclitus and Anaxagoras both oppose this, so they cannot describe the world realistically, that is, they cannot grasp the world conceptually.
It should be pointed out here that Aristotle's critique of Heraclitus is incorrect.
Heraclitus's idea that everything is in flux means that everything is in eternal change, which is the highest dialectical law of the world.
Aristotle, on the other hand, observes and analyzes all things from the perspective of the relative static state of his world, that is, the relative static state of things before the quantitative change stage and not the qualitative change.
Of course, this method of observing and analyzing problems is absolutely necessary, otherwise we will not have knowledge as Aristotle said.
But this is only one aspect of the dialectical form of the existence of things, and it would be a great mistake to exaggerate it as the only form of existence in the world, while denying the other aspect of the eternal change of things.
This article was originally written by "Kun Peng Theory" and is rejected without consent**
Please pay attention to this Baijia number, Kun Peng has been established since the end of 2015, the founders are Feng Lipeng, Teng Dapeng, including Baijia, Toutiao, Xueqiu, Sohu, NetEase, Sina and many other well-known ** or self-** platforms of special experts or special columnists, has published more than 6,000 original articles and Q&A.