Recently, the "engagement case" that continues to arouse heated discussions has been announced, and the defendant man was sentenced to three years in prison in the first instance for committing the ** crime, and the defendant has appealed in court.
Prior to this, the "engagement case" first entered the public eye, and the defendant's family kept shouting grievances on the Internet and revealing some details of the case, and the wind of ** has always been in favor of the defendant. Previously, rumors such as "cheating marriage", "blackmailing with sue **", "on the 4th day after the engagement and relationship, the girl accused ** that "the parties were in a cohabitation relationship", "the victim had a marriage history", and "the victim gave the marriage agency 30,000 yuan in referral fees", which continued to increase the attention of the case, but they were all confirmed to be false information.
According to the two contents released by the Rong** Center of Yanggao County, Datong City on December 25, the basic content of the case has been disclosed, especially the second content, the presiding judge was interviewed by reporters and answered questions of concern to the public.
When answering reporters' questions, the presiding judge clearly displayed the facts ascertained by the court in front of the public, especially the situation of the victim and the details of the incident that had never been mentioned in previous news reports.
It is not difficult to see the situation at the time of the case from the answers during the trial, especially the first disclosure of the victim's coercion and dragging, which avoids the public from being misguided by the news, sees the whole picture of the matter, and understands the legal basis and the truth of the incident that the defendant was sentenced to **, so as to avoid "biased hearing and biased belief".
The public's attention to this case mainly stems from the collision of various concepts.
With the blessing of traditional thought, engagement is also considered to be a conventional "marriage relationship", especially for modern young people, there is no shortage of premarital cohabitation and unmarried pregnancy, etc., in most cases, some people think that there is no "** theory" between boyfriend and girlfriend, especially when it comes to high bride price, ** is aimed at the victim woman here.
From the perspective of rational rule of law, even in a marital relationship, sexual autonomy is an important right of women, so forcing women to have sex by violent means without the consent of women is a "** crime".
What do you think about this?