The Russian Federation, large and mysterious, has a showdown of the century with Japan over the South Kuril Islands. This article traces history, unravels the territorial disputes after World War II, analyzes the wrestling between the two sides, and explores who the South Kuril Islands belong to.
1. The historical origins of the South Kuril Islands.
Russia's issue of the South Kuril Islands has a long history, from the first contact in the 17th century, to the division of the Kuril Islands in 1855 by the Russo-Japanese Amity Agreement, the occupation of the South Kuril Islands by Japan, and the transfer of all sovereignty to Japan in 1875 by the Sakhalin Kuril Islands Exchange Agreement. And after the Russo-Japanese War of 1904, the ownership of the South Kuril Islands was no longer disputed, and it became a foregone conclusion at the end of World War II.
2. The Cold War between the Soviet Union and Japan.
In 1945, the Yalta Agreement provided for the subordination of the South Kuril Islands to the USSR. However, the pressure of the Cold War has caused the issue of the South Kuril Islands to heat up again. In 1956, the Japan-Soviet Joint Declaration created an opportunity for the normalization of diplomatic relations between the two countries, but in 1960, the Soviet Union proposed that Japan should withdraw all foreign forces before returning the South Kuril Islands, creating a stalemate.
3. The tortuous course of Russian-Japanese relations.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had a low profile on the issue of the South Kuril Islands, but Japan** underestimated the territorial dispute, which led to a blatant inspection of the South Kuril Islands by the Koizumi cabinet in 2004, which triggered a resolute response from Russia. Relations between Russia and Japan have gone through twists and turns, with the "Irkutsk Statement" proposed during Putin's period failing to solve the problem, and Russia's low profile was later rejected by Japan.
Fourth, the current situation of the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan.
At present, the South Kuril Islands are still under the de facto control of Russia, and although Japan has sought a peace agreement, Russia's firm attitude and strength make it difficult to solve the problem. The rhetoric of Japanese politicians provoked a strong reaction from Russia, indicating that the issue of the South Kuril Islands remains an unresolved problem.
5. Future developments in the dispute over the South Kuril Islands.
As the international landscape changes, disputes over the South Kuril Islands between Russia and Japan are likely to continue. It is difficult to bridge the differences between the two sides on geopolitical and historical issues, and the settlement of the territorial dispute still requires the joint efforts of both sides.
Epilogue. 
The issue of the South Kuril Islands is not only a territorial dispute between Russia and Japan, but also an interweaving of history and politics. With a hundred years of history, this land carries the strife of the past and the hopes of the future. And as for who exactly the South Kuril Islands should belong, perhaps the truth can only be revealed by time and negotiations between the two sides.
The South Kuril Islands dispute: the precipitation of history and the fog of the future.
In this article about the dispute between Russia and Japan over the South Kuril Islands, we are guided through the fog of history and delved into the origins, development and future direction of this century-old dispute. Through the tracing of historical events, the author presents the intricate and distorted situation of this territorial dispute.
First of all, the article outlines the tortuous course of the South Kuril Islands in a solid historical background, so that readers have a clearer understanding of the disputes in this region. From the contacts at the beginning of the 17th century, to the division of the Kuril Islands by the Russo-Japanese Goodwill Agreement of 1855, to the exchange of sovereignty over the Kuril Islands by the Sakhalin Kuril Islands Exchange Agreement of 1875, every historical juncture constitutes the cornerstone of the development of this dispute.
Secondly, the article analyzes the dispute between the USSR and Japan during the Cold War, highlighting the impact of international pressure on the issue of the South Kuril Islands at that time. The Yalta agreement won the South Kuril Islands for the Soviet Union, but the Cold War situation heated up the problem again. The 1956 Japan-Soviet Joint Declaration provided an opportunity for the normalization of diplomatic relations between the two countries, but the Soviet Union's conditions toward Japan in 1960 brought the issue to an impasse.
Moreover, through the analysis of the tortuous course of Russian-Japanese relations, the article reveals the attitude and response of the two sides to the issue of the South Kuril Islands. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had shown a low profile, but Japan** underestimated the territorial dispute, which led to a blatant visit of the South Kuril Islands by the Koizumi cabinet in 2004, which triggered a resolute response from Russia.
Finally, the article gives in-depth reflection on the current situation and future development of the dispute over the South Kuril Islands. At the moment, the South Kuril Islands remain under the actual control of Russia, and the solution of the problem seems to be even more difficult. The article highlights the complexity of the territorial dispute and the time it takes to resolve it and the joint efforts of both sides.
Overall, this article profoundly reveals the complexity and intractability of the dispute over the South Kuril Islands through an analysis of historical, political, and geopolitical relations. The intertwining of the two sides' historical ties, political positions, and international pressures makes the solution of the issue complex and tortuous. For readers, this article provides a comprehensive and in-depth perspective that allows us to better understand the nature of this historical strife and the uncertainty of its future.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!