An expert has revealed their thoughts on the fuel emissions of Taylor Swift's aircraft.
The singer, who sang "Blank Space," came under fire for using a plane, which she flew to and from during the show to support her boyfriend, Travis Kells, a player for the Kansas City Chiefs.
However, should Mildew shake it off, or should she turn around and tell those who hate her that you need to calm down?
A carbon footprint measurement expert has settled this controversy.
Swift's CO2 emissions first came to the spotlight late last year, when the Instagram account Taylor Swift Jet claimed on its platform that the singer-songwriter emitted 138 tonnes of CO2 in three months, flew around the world between tours of her era, and also stopped by Kelsey's NFL games.
According to reports, 12,622 gallons of aviation fuel were used for the trip, which was worth up to 70779 USD.
A representative for Swift told Unilad at the time: "Before the tour began in March 2023, Taylor purchased more than twice as many carbon credits to offset the carbon credits needed for all tours.
These extra points meant that Taylor earned enough to pay for her latest romance that broke out during the tour, and her trip to support Kelsey increased her carbon footprint, while she also planned the tour. ”
However, as Mildew took the equivalent of a 28-minute drive on a plane and managed to catch a Kelce Super Bowl 2024 game from the Eras Tour concert in Tokyo, Japan, her emissions appear to have risen — even though she abandoned a plane amid backlash.
Austin Whitman, CEO of The Climate Change Project, a nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating carbon emissions, revealed his thoughts on Swift's emissions.
He told Vice that "recent estimates" suggest that Swift's CO2 emissions will rise to "about 8,000 – 10,000 tonnes of CO2 per year".
The carbon footprint measurement expert thinks this estimate is "eye-popping", especially when you compare it to "about 20-30 tonnes for those of us in rich countries".
Whitman thinks Swift's use of private jets is "very bad," but he understands why celebrities like her may not be safe to fly on commercial jets.
But could Swift have done better?
Experts advise Swift not only to buy carbon offsets, but also to be aware of her own "climate shadow" – how she affects the rest of the world when it comes to climate issues, rather than being a "negative impact".
Whitman decided, "What would I do if I were Taylor Swift?" Yes, I would buy carbon credits; I'll buy the highest quality carbon credits I can find, I'm a billionaire.
Will I be traveling privately? "Probably because I think it's troublesome to worry about my safety on a regular plane.
Will I influence my millions of fans and followers by talking about climate change? Absolute.
As an influencer, what she can do is much more powerful than the negative impact of her carbon emissions. She can literally make a single post on Instagram and change enough behavior, well over 8,000 tonnes of carbon emissions – that's her true power. ”