Hangzhou students get the most benefit from the announcement of the first exam results.
Foreword: The results of the first exam of the 2024 college entrance examination are out, and Hangzhou students are the biggest beneficiaries, however, the fairness of this has also aroused doubts among netizens. Through the analysis of the college entrance examination results of Hangzhou students, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of Hangzhou students' college entrance examination results, and analyzes their future development trends.
Hangzhou students are the biggest beneficiaries.
After the results of the first exam, we saw a mixed picture. However, Hangzhou students are the biggest beneficiaries of this college entrance examination. Judging from the data, there are 7 places in the top 10 in the country for students in Hangzhou this year, and Hangzhou ranks first.
Second, there are 3 students in the top 10 in Xuejun, and the first place is He Ziyuan from Hangzhou No. 2 High School. Such a brilliant achievement is rare in the past decade, and people can't help but worry and question.
Such achievements are manifold. First of all, everyone knows that the questions in this college entrance examination are difficult, and there are more questions in the examination room in Zhejiang than in previous years, but the students in Hangzhou do not seem to be affected much. Some netizens suspect that this has something to do with the fact that the questioners in Hangzhou may know better than them how to prepare for the college entrance examination.
Secondly, Hangzhou has a lot of information**, and Hangzhou college students have unique conditions in this regard; However, if educational resources are overly concentrated in Hangzhou, the city's education system will not be able to withstand such pressure, and the fairness of its testing will be questioned.
On the question of the impartiality of the test.
In recent years, there have been new changes in the form of propositions in China's college English tests, such as "question type questions" and "open questions". The question is considered to be a response to the reform of the gaokao and aims to develop analytical reading and creative thinking among candidates. However, some rural or average level students do not get good grades because they do not have sufficient problem-solving skills. This leads to both an injustice in educational equity and an increase in competition among students.
In addition to the difficulty of the test questions, the fairness of teaching is also closely related to the arrangement and release of the test syllabus. Students in some county high schools may not have encountered relevant questions at all before the college entrance examination, and they do not know the specific content. When they are faced with problems that they have never been exposed to, they often struggle to behave, which makes them feel very distressed. So some people think that this kind of test is a group of teachers who are out of touch with reality and deliberately give students difficult problems in order to stand out from them.
However, for many parents, they simply hope that their children will get satisfactory grades and enter college after thirteen years of hard work. They don't want their children to be influenced by the education system. This requires us to pay more attention to educational equity and ensure that every child has equal opportunities.
Resource preference issues.
In recent years, there has been an obvious tendency of "bias" in Zhejiang's college admissions examinations. For example, in Tsinghua University's "Climbing Program" and Peking University's "Excellence Class", Hangzhou has the largest number of students selected. In a sense, the educational resources in Hangzhou show an obvious agglomeration trend. The reason for this bias may be because of Hangzhou's education model, which attaches more importance to the creativity and all-round development of students, so it stands out in such a selection project.
However, if this resource is monopolized by Hangzhou, it may result in children elsewhere not being able to receive an equal education. Due to the high concentration of schools, some top students do not have the opportunity to be fully developed, which leads to the lack of quality.
Objective: To improve students' learning ability and improve their learning ability. It is necessary to pay attention to the balanced development of educational resources to ensure that every child can participate equally. In addition, attention should also be paid to the setting of test questions to ensure that the test questions are reasonable and applicable, so that every candidate has the opportunity to show their talents. Only in this way can education be made more equitable and that every child can have his or her own ideals.