How to write criticism and self-criticism in organizational life?
Down-to-earth self-criticism.
1. Learning.
1.The depth of theoretical learning is not enough. In the usual learning process, I only care about doing specific work in a certain aspect, and I do not consciously take the initiative to squeeze in time to learn theoretical knowledge. Sometimes I have a little time, and I just simply flip through the book, look at the title, see what I am interested in, and see what is related to my work.
2.Relax and delve deeper. In recent years, my work has become busier and busier, so I have relaxed my self-requirements, and I often go to the Internet to look up and research when I use something for work, or encounter something I don't understand. Sometimes.
I just copied and copied the content of collective learning, and I was still thinking about things at work in my head, and I didn't combine my actual work to draw inferences about the principles and methods and study them in depth.
3.There is a gap in the combination of learning and application. For example, in the implementation of a certain work, I will only follow the step-by-step, step by step to listen to the leader's arrangement before acting, encounter problems, rarely can be combined with theoretical thinking in the first place to do not in place? The gap is in**? Failure to effectively transfer learning and education outcomes.
The motivation to work for so-and-so is caused by the lack of close integration between my learning and application.
Down-to-earth self-criticism.
Second, the style of work.
1.The awareness of strict implementation of the system is not strong enough. Sometimes it is one-sided to think that it is enough to do a good job, and there will be some flexibility in the implementation of the system, and it cannot be strictly implemented without any difference. For example, when writing some urgent materials or implementing some urgent tasks assigned by the leader, it is customary to focus on specific content and specific work, and sometimes there is no strict reporting and review of the process step by step.
2.The implementation of responsibilities is not strict enough. I am always accustomed to what the leader says, I will do it, I am used to waiting for the leader to arrange before acting, and rarely take the initiative to study how to implement the work in combination with the actual situation, and I am satisfied with not making mistakes, and I relax the requirements for work standards. There is no thought from the side.
Carefully analyze the causes of problems, and do not have high standards and strict requirements to implement their own work.
3.It's still not hard enough. I have been working for xx years, and I have always paid attention to my words and deeds and controlled myself, but I will also participate in some people who are sophisticated, and consciously resist the pull and pull of various relationships, and I do not fully realize that this is not only a table that affects my own image.
At present, this point still needs to be criticized and supervised by all leaders and everyone.
3. Capacity.
1.The sharpness to grasp to the end is insufficient. The systematic and forward-looking nature of thinking about things and dealing with problems is insufficient, and the courage and vigor to remove obstacles are insufficient. In the face of the difficulties and problems that arise in the work, his own vision is not high, and there are many objective reasons to find them, and he takes responsibility from his own work ideas.
There is little in-depth analysis in terms of aspects, and there is still a phenomenon that the results are not obvious in the performance of certain duties. Work is accustomed to the implementation of conventional thinking, hands and feet can not be let go, the steps are not big, and sometimes there are difficult thoughts.
2.The ability to innovate is not strong enough. The pursuit of work is stable and step-by-step, which may be related to their own character, or it may be related to many years of work experience, although they can grasp the responsibilities and tasks, but only pay attention to the steady and orderly implementation of the work on the line, encountered.
The problem is also that they are unconsciously accustomed to finding solutions from past conventions, and are not good at exploring practice and refining experience. Over the years, there are new requirements for a certain work, not only to complete well, but also to explore and summarize practices, I sometimes think about how to innovate some better practices, but still dare to be the first spirit is insufficient, do some work, but is only satisfied with completion.