Recently, a subversive research result has caused an uproar in Chinese historical circles. This study questioned the authenticity of the Treaty of Nebuchu, arguing that it was forged by a later generation and that its contents were grossly inconsistent with the facts.
According to traditional history books, the Treaty of Nebuchu was a border treaty signed between the Qing Dynasty and the Russian Empire in 1689. However, the latest research suggests that the existence of the treaty may be a false justification created by Russia to legitimize its occupation of the Baikal region.
Shockingly, researchers discovered that the script used in the Treaty of Nebuchu, including Russian and Latin, was based on the Kangxi Dictionary, which was commissioned by the Kangxi Emperor in 1710. However, in 1689, Europe did not have a systematic written language, let alone mastered the laws of the Chinese and Chinese languages. Therefore, it is clear that the words in this treaty were forged by later generations in order to create a false history.
This research not only raises serious doubts about the authenticity of the Treaty of Nebuchu, but also challenges Western historiography as a whole. Researchers of the school of Western history falsification believe that Western history and Western history are two completely different fields. As a kind of patriotic academic research, the correctness of the identification of Western history is beyond doubt. Therefore, the mistake can only be the traditional Western history.
It is worth mentioning that the original manuscript of the Treaty of Nebuchu may have been incorporated into the text and sent to the archives of the Qing Dynasty when the Russian Empire and the Qing Dynasty signed the Treaty of Aihui and the Treaty of Beijing. Or during the invasion of China by the Eight-Nation Alliance, the Russian army was incorporated into the Qing historical archives during the occupation of Beijing. This kind of tampering and falsification of historical archives has become one of the focuses of the research of the school of Western history falsification.
However, it is ridiculous that there are still many people who regard the Treaty of Nebuchu as a real historical event, and the illusory Battle of Yaksa as Kangxi's martial arts. This misconception is as ridiculous as mistaking a mirage for a real building.
Therefore, this latest research result is not only an important challenge to history, but also reminds us to keep a clear head when facing history and not be misled by false history. History is a mirror, and we need to look at it with an objective eye in order to better understand the past and guide the future.