Preamble:
As the war in Ukraine continues, the help provided by the United States to it has also attracted public attention. Ukraine** Zelensky also said that if the United States cannot give assistance, Ukraine will be in trouble. However, there is still debate about whether Ukraine can get enough help. From Zelensky's standpoint, the article provides a detailed analysis of the role of Ukrainian aid and its future development direction.
Ukraine's appeal for rescue:
Fighting in Ukraine is frequent, and the loss of Avdeyevka is a cause for concern. The retreat of the Ukrainian army, which has not received any help, highlights the urgent need for foreign help in Ukraine. Biden blamed Ukraine's actions for the delay in the aid bill in Congress. The help of the United States to Ukraine is not only related to the outcome of the war in Ukraine, but also to the morale of Ukrainians. Zelensky also admitted that there is no "plan B", which means that Ukraine does not have any backup plan and can only rely on external forces.
Fortunately, Ukrainians still have a chance to survive. Zelensky's words and actions reflect the different opinions of the population. Although most people are looking forward to peace with Russia, Zelensky insists on enlisting the help of the West, which is also his political direction. At the rescue site, Zelensky has been trying to save Ukraine's suffering.
The real and the illusory of salvation:
Although the United States helped Ukraine a lot, it did not play a decisive role. In recent years, there has been no breakthrough in the massive rescue efforts of the United States, and the war in Ukraine has reached a stalemate. Democrats have delayed approval of the rescue plan, reflecting the attitude of the population. The situation of national assistance to Ukraine may shrink, which makes Ukraine more and more worried.
However, for Ukraine, providing help is not the only solution. Zelensky's power is small, and he still needs a reaction from the population at home. While Western help may be a life-saving tool, Ukraine must be self-reliant and free itself from external dependence. Zelensky has shown tenacious determination and still expects a good ending for foreign aid, and this dilemma may show the helplessness in his heart.
The conclusion: Ukraine's Zelensky's speech highlights the dilemma of a country with a weak system and a fragile face the threat of external forces. While it is true that this aid will actually help Ukraine, it will not benefit Ukraine's future in the long run. In order for Ukraine to follow its own path, it must extricate itself from excessive external forces, take the initiative to meet new opportunities, and take the path of independent development. Support can only provide temporary support, and the real strength comes from our own unremitting efforts and the joint efforts of all people. The main consequences of U.S. aid.
1. Ukraine on the verge of war:
The fall of Avdeyevka is only a small part of the Ukrainian front. The fact that the Ukrainian army had to withdraw from the area due to the blockage of American rescue shows how weak Ukraine's military power is. The fact that the Russian side claimed that the Russian army had been routed before the Russian army retreated put Ukraine in a dilemma. Zelenskyy accused the U.S. Congress of not passing a new bailout bill on time, blaming the U.S. for the loss of the war in Ukraine.
Under such circumstances, the fighting spirit of the Uzbeians will inevitably be greatly damaged. Zelenskyy also realizes that some of the help provided by the United States is only a kind of mental support, so the lack of this help will make the Ukrainian army lose self-confidence and make it even more negative. The United States provides not only material support, but also psychological support. The operations of the Ukrainian army have also shown that they are in dire need of help.
2. A word from Zelensky:
Ukraine's Zelensky's concern about Ukraine's current situation underscores his position. Zelenskyy admitted that he has no other option in the uncertain situation offered by the United States, which clearly shows how much Ukraine is dependent on external forces. He did not come up with a "Plan B", which shows the limits of his strategy in Ukraine, but also the lack of a diplomatic strategy in Ukraine. Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko proposed another option to Zelensky, but the reality is that Ukraine does not have enough financial resources to support the alternative.
The significance of the help of the United States to Zelensky is irreplaceable. He called for help, mainly to solve Ukraine's current predicament, whether in terms of the army or in the political aspect, Ukraine urgently needs external help to maintain stability and development in the country.
3. Help with reality and fantasy:
Although the United States and other Western countries have provided Ukraine with a lot of help in ways that Russia expected, Ukraine did not win the war. This raises doubts about the effectiveness of the bailout. Ukraine has not made military progress after years of help, making the assistance it can provide to it a matter of debate.
For Ukraine, bailouts are a supplement, not an outright answer. At present, the passage of the rescue plan is facing a problem, that is, in the situation in Ukraine, the Democrats have been slow to act, which also shows their dissatisfaction with the current situation. Even if support is finally obtained, the long-term implications are worth pondering. Aid is not the only solution for Ukraine, it must also rely on Ukraine's own strength and reform, get out of the shackles of foreign aid, and embark on the path of sustainable development.
All in all, Ukraine's future cannot rely only on foreign aid, but also on its own transformation and efforts. If Ukraine is to emerge from the crisis and move towards lasting peace and stability, it must be reformed from within.