What did these experts, professors, and deputies to the National People s Congress say? It makes the

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-02-02

What did these experts, professors, and deputies to the National People's Congress say that made the people so disgusted? Once upon a time, experts and professors were synonymous with authority, and only authoritative figures who have achieved extremely high achievements in a certain field could be called experts. But now let's take a look at these experts and professors in today's society, what are they studying every day?

This first, let's talk about it, Huang Youguang, a distinguished chair professor at the School of Economics of Fudan University, put forward such a proposal in China, he advocated that oil should rise 10 times on the existing basis, only in this way, people without money can not afford to drive, there will be no congestion without traffic, and the environment can be protected from pollution. Do you say that's what people say? Then I can guarantee that 80% of people will not buy a petrol car. What's even more infuriating is that he proposed polyandry, he said that in today's society, there are more men and fewer women, and there are too many singles, is this the solution to the problem? If he is married to three more husbands, I don't know how he feels, how can such a statement come out of the mouth of a literate expert professor?

The second one was angry when he heard it. ** Wang Fuzhong, a professor at the University of Finance and Economics, believes that only by eliminating the peasants of the whole country can China become truly rich. He believes that the reason why the peasants cannot shake off poverty and become rich is because the peasants are lazy in their thinking and are unwilling to make efforts. He also accused farmers of using machinery to harvest wheat as a bad habit that was both lazy and polluting the environment. He believes that crops sprout and grow by themselves, and have little to do with peasant raising, and completely negates the contributions made by peasants. Hearing him say this, I want to ask him, did your ancestors have no farmers for three generations? You go and ask them how the crops grow? I don't even have this bit of common sense, and I am still a university professor? Isn't this a misguided child?

The third is Chi Shusheng, a deputy to the National People's Congress, who has insisted on the proposal of legalization for 9 consecutive years, and the reason for her proposal is that if the legalization is implemented, then it will create an opportunity for women to work. Don't you think this society is chaotic enough? As a people's congress deputy, you should summarize the opinions and suggestions that everyone is most concerned about and submit them to the people's congress session on behalf of the people. I wonder who else but you can have such wishes and ideas that need to be submitted online? You trampled on the dignity of all women, what decent woman would do such a thing? But any woman who points her face, who will take ** as a profession?

The fourth is Ding Zuohong, member of the Standing Committee for Industry and Commerce and vice chairman of the Chamber of Commerce. Experts say that the middle-aged and elderly population should be re-divided, and the middle-aged age should be set at between 65 and 79 years old, and middle-aged people over 60 years old, even when they are old and strong, can still participate in work and contribute to society. I have to say that our expert is talented and seems to have found a way to solve the aging of the population. But I think maybe this method can be improved, and you just divide all people from 3 to 100 years old into young adults, wouldn't it be better? In this way, our country will all be young and middle-aged, so isn't the labor force solved?

Speaking of which, I really don't dare to say any more, I'm afraid that if I say it again, I have the heart to scold him for three generations of ancestors. You talk about these experts and professors, they don't engage in scientific research, they don't engage in innovation, they specialize in catching the common people, implying that they don't go deep into the lives of the people, they don't conduct research, they don't consider problems from the standpoint of the people, they just talk about it like that, and they are full of guns. I wonder what you think of the advice and opinions of these expert professors? Feel free to leave a message in the comment area.

Related Pages